The necessary proposition, he argues, does not make the existence of a triangle necessary.
2.
Now he argues from the possibility of production . " It is possible that something can be produced " is a necessary proposition.
3.
He considers examples of necessary propositions, such as " a triangle has three angles ", and rejects the transfer of this logic to the existence of God.
4.
First, he argues that such necessary propositions are necessarily true only if such a being exists : " If " a triangle exists, it must have three angles.
5.
If the first argument is alternatively qualified with the notion of ontological possibility, then we have necessary propositions as follows : It is possible that there is something different from God it is not of itself ( because then it would not be the case that it were possible ), nor from nothing.